spacer
home > ebr > autumn 2009 > mycoplasma contamination - the invisible threat?
PUBLICATIONS
European Biopharmaceutical Review

Mycoplasma Contamination - The Invisible Threat?

 

Cell cultures are increasingly being used for the manufacture of biopharmaceutical products. Contamination of these cell cultures by mycoplasma is a fundamental problem, as it potentially compromises the safety of the drugs being produced. Therefore, biopharmaceutical production must comply with different legal requirements and regulatory bodies all over the world. Recently, new techniques for rapid and comprehensive mycoplasma detection have been developed and validated in accordance with legal guidelines, replacing the time-consuming microbiology culture methods.

MYCOPLASMA CONTAMINATIONS IN BIOPHARMA

Contamination of cell cultures by mycoplasmas is a widespread and serious problem in biological research and biopharmaceutical production. Although testing cell cultures for mycoplasmas has increased in recent decades, it has been suggested that up to 30 per cent of cell cultures in current use are still infected, including those distributed by commercial culture collections (1).

Mycoplasmas (or Mollicutes) represent a distinct class of prokaryotes which are characterised by the lack of a substantial cell wall. With a size of only 0.2 to 2μm in diameter, they are considered to be the smallest bacteria known so far. Since the first report of the detection of mycoplasma in cell culture in the 1950s, more than 100 different mycoplasma species have been identified (2). The majority of the cell culture infections are caused by only a few species. Depending on the host cell line and the cell culture matrix used for cultivation, the species Mycoplasma arginini, M hyorhinis, M hominis, M orale, M fermentans and Acholeplasma laidlawii usually represent over 90 per cent of the identified contaminants. The frequency of these species may vary due to different applications and studies. If complex cell culture matrices are used for the production of biotechnological compounds, such as avian-, insect- or plant-based material, other mycoplasma species such as M gallisepticum, M synoviae or Spiroplasma citri may also be identified (3).


Read full article from PDF >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

 You must be a member of the site to make a comment.
spacer
Björn Breth, PhD, obtained his Masters degree in biotechnology working on proand eukaryotic fermentation processes and drug characterisation. During his PhD thesis, he focused on microarray-based analyses and characterisation of transcription factors. He continued his scientific career developing molecular test systems for high-throughput screening in cooperation with international biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. At Greiner Bio-One GmbH, he is responsible for the development of bacterial, viral and human identification systems for the biopharmaceutical industry. Recently, he has become a member of the FDA mycoplasma working group.
spacer
Björn Breth
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement
News and Press Releases

Vaccitech’s VTP-200 Ph 1b/2 Study Demonstrates Favorable Tolerability and Immunogenicity Profile at Interim Analysis in Women with Low-Grade Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-related Cervical Lesions

OXFORD, United Kingdom, March 20, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Vaccitech plc (NASDAQ: VACC), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of novel T cell immunotherapeutics designed to use the power of the immune system to potentially treat and cure chronic infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases and cancer, today announced topline interim data from the HPV001 study (NCT04607850), a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial of VTP-200 in women with low-grade cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) lesions.
More info >>

White Papers

The Role of the CRO in Effective Risk-Based Monitoring

Medpace

The clinical trial industry is evolving. In an effort to improve participant safety and data integrity, regulators are encouraging trial sponsors to transition from a focused on-site monitoring approach they have traditionally employed toward a risk-based approach that utilizes a combination of centralized and on-site monitoring techniques to ensure patient safety and data quality. The Risk-Based Monitoring (RBM) paradigm has many potential advantages over established monitoring practices including enhanced patient safety and data integrity, more efficient and effective protocol design, reduced costs, and the ability to strategically adjust oversight in keeping with changes in risk level.
More info >>

 

 

 

©2000-2011 Samedan Ltd.
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement