spacer
home > ebr > autumn 2017 > revamping regulations
PUBLICATIONS
European Biopharmaceutical Review

Revamping Regulations

Stem cell products hold great promise for multiple clinical indications and are actively studied in clinical trials (1). However, many related safety features raise concerns and currently generate extensive and costly testing of the final product, if intended for clinical use. The regulatory expectations for stem cell testing for clinical studies, as well as marketing authorisation applications, are not entirely clear, up-to-date or detailed. Furthermore, differences between US and EU guidance, in this respect, hamper the current development of products for EU markets.

Risk Profiling

Stem cells used for therapeutic purposes include a wide variety of cells with different type differentiation capacities, spanning from restricted multipotent up to pluripotent stem cells (2). Hematopoietic stem cells have been widely used for ex vivo gene therapy of monogenic inherited diseases, and mesenchymal stem cells have been utilised – eg in treatment of Graft versus Host Disease – for more than a decade due to their immunomodulatory properties (3,4). Pluripotent stem cells, ie embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), are still in early clinical development, yet some clinical data are already available (5,6).

When considering possible risks of stem cells, several issues need to be considered, such as the donor (autologous versus allogeneic), characteristics of the cells, extent of manipulation, design of vectors for genetic modification, dose and the existing knowledge of the cell type/product to be used. One of the main concerns related to stem cell products is tumourigenicity. For pluripotent stem cells, teratoma formation is part of their natural characteristics, which calls for thorough control of the cell differentiation status before clinical use.

Read full article from PDF >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

spacer
Dr Paula Salmikangas, Director for Biopharmaceuticals and ATMPs, NDA Advisory Board, is a clinical biochemist by original training with a PhD in muscle cell biology. Since 2006, she has been an Adjunct Professor of Biochemistry for the University of Helsinki, Finland. Paula joined NDA in 2017, has served as a member of the EMA Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) from 2009 to 2017 and has been the Chair of the CAT 2014-2017. Her main areas of expertise are biological medicinal products, especially ATMPs, chemistry, manufacturing and controls aspects of biopharmaceuticals.
spacer
Dr Paula Salmikangas
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement
News and Press Releases

Charles River Laboratories Acquires KWS BioTest

WILMINGTON, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 11, 2018-- Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (NYSE: CRL) today announced that it has acquired KWS BioTest, a leading contract research organization (CRO) specializing in in vitro and in vivo discovery testing services for immuno-oncology and inflammatory and infectious diseases. The addition of KWS enhances Charles River’s discovery expertise, with complementary offerings that provide our clients with additional tools in the active therapeutic research areas of oncology and immunology.
More info >>

White Papers

Recommendations for Implementing Assessment Criteria Guidelines in Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Clinical Trials

Perceptive Informatics

Standardized assessment criteria are becoming increasingly important in obtaining valid outcomes in oncology clinical trials. While standardized criteria encourage a more uniform approach to assessing clinical trial data, they are often subject to the interpretation of the user. These differences in interpretation, while seemingly minor, can have a major impact on assessments. The most commonly used standardized criteria for lymphoma have been no exception. Differences such as minimum new lesion size, lymph node normalization size requirements, inclusion of extranodal lesions and assessment of organomegaly can have a profound effect on overall response. Additionally, heightened scrutiny of the assessment criteria used in a given protocol can lead to questions about a drug’s efficacy if not applied correctly according to regulators’ interpretation.
More info >>

 
Industry Events

Drug Discovery 2018

21-22 March 2018, Copthorne Tara Hotel, Scarsdale Place, Kensington, London

SMi Group is proud to announce the return of Drug Discovery in 2018. The successful conference will return for its 2nd year on the 21st and 22nd March.
More info >>

 

 

©2000-2011 Samedan Ltd.
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement