spacer
home > ict > spring 2011 > measuring success
PUBLICATIONS
International Clinical Trials

Measuring Success

Pharmaceuticals is a business different from all others. Firstly, it is dedicated to helping sick people, and improving health and well-being. This is a noble task and the fact that it is also a lucrative business only proves the value it has for individuals as well as for public institutions. Secondly, the discovery and development process for pharmaceutical products is long, expensive, uncertain and highly regulated. If you were a 40- year old scientist working on the discovery of new compounds in pharmaceuticals, there is a fair chance that you would be retired before your discoveries become marketed drugs. The full cycle from bench to bedside can easily exceed 20 years. And there is a substantial risk that none of your molecules, even the most promising ones, will ever become an actual drug. Indeed, less than one per cent of the drugs tested in man get registered, and the rate is one in thousands if we go back to the chemistry lab. Combining all these factors yields a gigantic bill for successfully developing and registering a drug, which is close to one billion dollars.

Finally, our marketing model is a unique combination where one party gives permission to market the product (health authorities), one party selects the product (prescribing physician), one party decides the price (government), one party uses it (patient), and one party pays for it (insurance). Still, our offices look like everyone else’s, our production plants are similar and our balance sheets are, well, normal balance sheets.

PILOTING A BUSINESS

So how do you pilot a business that is like no other? How do you make sure that spending a billion dollars today will, in 20 years from now, produce a drug which will help people fight disease, will reimburse all its development costs – as well as the costs of all the other 99 unsuccessful drugs – create a profit for the shareholders, and make the company a place where people want to work and feel happy?

The answer came from the Harvard Business School where, in the mid-90s, two visionary professors, Robert Kaplan and David Norton, developed what came to be known as the balanced scorecard (BSC). They started from the realisation that short-term financial results are insufficient for describing the situation and driving the strategy of large corporations. One needs to look at other factors as well. Of course, the BSC was developed for all types of companies but it fits on like a glove to ours because of all the particularities described above.

THE BSC: SETTING A STRATEGY

The founders’ point was not to create complex dashboards where key performance indicators (KPIs) line up; it was to determine and track the few metrics that tell you if you are following your strategy and if this strategy is taking you where you want to go. Four strategic categories were defined for this purpose and our industry has a high stake in each and every one of these:
  • People: every company wants to attract and develop the best people, but this is critical in knowledge-based organisations where skills and education are key
  • Processes: to make good products in an efficient way, every company needs good processes in place. In the ultra-regulated pharmaceutical environment, this is a life-or-death matter
  • Customers: the most amazing product sitting in a warehouse is of little use to anyone. Products must get to the customers, address their needs and gain their approval. Nobody has a more complex customer situation than the pharma industry
  • Financials: of course, the whole exercise must be profitable in order to attract capital and we need heavy investments for many years. Investors’ trust is paramount to success
Inside each of the four strategic categories, the BSC defines objectives that derive from the company strategy and map to strategic initiatives. These strategic objectives will be pursued over the years. Each department, each team and each individual can contribute in some way.



GAUGING SUCCESS

Companies must then decide how to measure the contribution to these objectives. Obviously the metrics vary from one part of the organisation to another. What is important is to set and describe the measures that will be used in a precise and unambiguous way, as well as set long-term and short-term (yearly) targets. Now here comes the innovative part: rather than just comparing the actual values to the targets, the BSC has come up with a smart way of determining if the company is doing well or not. It uses minimum and maximum values to calculate performance:
  • A minimum value sets the threshold below which something must be done to correct the way of working. It is the ‘red zone’
  • Between the minimum and target, it is a question of effort. The company is doing the right thing, but may need to go the ‘extra mile’ to get to their target
  • From target to maximum, the company is doing a great job, exceeding expectation in a predictable rate
  • Performance above maximum indicates either an exceptional event or inadequate target setting. Again something may need to be done to correct this
The BSC is set at the corporate level and can be cascaded down the organisation structure. In all cases, it is important to understand that a BSC is not a management control instrument; it is a smart tool that helps planning and managing strategy, gives everyone visibility on the company roadmap and provides a way of defining and measuring contribution to the implementation of that strategy.

Some companies keep it high level and others deploy it down to the level of individuals. Some link it to bonus payment and some don’t. But they all have one thing in common: once they adopt the BSC, they do not go back.


Read full article from PDF >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

spacer
Dimitri Stamatiadis, PhD, has more than 15 years’ experience in the pharmaceutical industry, working for both CROs and industrial corporations such as Boehringer Ingelheim, Lederle and Aventis in Europe and the Schering-Plough Research Institute in the US. In 2005 he moved to Geneva, Switzerland, where he headed up the EDMS replacement project at Merck Serono. He was involved very early on with introducing technology in pharmaceutical R&D. He is an active member of the DIA, European Chair of the Document and Records Management SIAC and author of several articles on the introduction of digital technology in pharmaceutical R&D. He graduated from the University of Patras with a BSc in Biology and continued his MSc and PhD at the University of Paris Pierre et Marie Curie. Subsequently, he obtained an MBA in Pharmaceutical Business from the University La Sorbonne, Paris. Email: dstamatiadis@hotmail.com
spacer
Dimitri Stamatiadis
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement
News and Press Releases

BioIVT Introduces New Quality Management System to Maintain Highest Quality Biospecimens and Drug Development Research Services

BioIVT, a leading provider of research models and services for drug and diagnostic development, today announced that it is introducing a new internal cloud-based Quality Management System (QMS), Master Control. This new standardized, ISO compliant QMS will help BioIVT manage documentation, auditing, supplier and customer accounts, and risk across all locations. It will consolidate and replace a variety of computer- and paper-based document control systems located at existing and newly-acquired BioIVT sites in the US, Europe and Asia.
More info >>

White Papers

Key to Outsourcing Method Development and Validation: A Pragmatic Approach

RSSL

In an industry that is seeing an increasing level of work being outsourced, the Contract Research Organisation (CRO) of choice needs to have proven experience in both the pragmatism and flexibility of the method developer’s mind set and a regulatory background in validation. As companies are focussing on achieving ever shorter times of drug to market, it is vital that a tailored, pragmatic approach is adopted when engaging in both method development and validation activities for an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) or drug product (DP). Although methods still require a high degree of robustness, the overall strategy should encompass a full evaluation of the regulatory requirements applicable to the particular phase of the drug life-cycle; this is pivotal in Key to Outsourcing Method Development and Validation A Pragmatic Approach order to ensure a successful regulatory submission, where the applicant must demonstrate suitable validation of all methods used to support the filing.
More info >>

 
Industry Events

10th Annual NGS & Clinical Diagnostics Congress

8-9 November 2018, London, UK

Oxford Global is proud to present its 10thAnnual NGS & Clinical Diagnostics Congress taking place on 8-9 November 2018 in London.  Part of the Genomics & Synthetic Biology Series UK, the congress will bring together over 600 end users representing internationally renowned research & academic institutions, clinical research institutions, healthcare organisations as well as leading pharmaceutical and biotech companies.
More info >>

 

 

©2000-2011 Samedan Ltd.
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement