spacer
home > pmps > autumn 2017 > levelling up
PUBLICATIONS
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Packing Sourcer

Levelling Up

The commercial benefits of continuous (as opposed to batch) manufacturing are well-documented. They include improved production efficiency, better capex and labour utilisation and enhanced product consistency. These benefits have already transformed the cost of production of many bulk commodities, simultaneously streamlining the associated supply chain. Those currently implementing continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing (CM) processes undoubtedly seek to realise these same gains, but perhaps the greater prize is the potential that CM offers to ease or even eliminate process scaleup. Taking a pharma process from the lab into commercial production within the prevailing regulatory environment is technically challenging, labour- and material-intensive and time-consuming. Streamlining the submission process and accelerating time to market are powerful drivers for change.

Understanding the Differences

Historically, the pharma industry has relied almost exclusively on sequential batch manufacturing processes. In this process, raw material is added at the start of the processing period, and product is discharged once a defined endpoint is reached. Material is neither added nor removed at any time, and in-process material is in a constant state of change. Conversely, in a continuous process, raw materials are continually added, product is continually discharged and the process operates. This last point is critical. Operation at a stable point makes it far easier to achieve high levels of product consistency and to manage and control the transition from one processing step to the next, facilitating the development of integrated processes.

A traditional batch tablet production process is shown in Figure 1. The product from each unit operation is tested postprocessing to ensure that the appropriate specification has been met, and then it is stored ahead of further processing. In contrast, with a well-controlled CM process, an integrated manufacturing train can potentially run from synthesis of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) through to tablet production, with minimal inventory or time delay between each processing step. Proceeding through development and submission to commercialisation with a CM process such as this is very different from analogous activities using a batch process.

Read full article from PDF >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

spacer
Alon Vaisman is Application Development Manager at Malvern Panalytical. Based at the company’s offices in Westborough, US, he supports pharma manufacturers worldwide in developing and improving their process operations through the use of in-process particle characterisation systems. Alon’s background is in mechanical engineering, and he has over 15 years of applications and support experience. 

Martin Warman is Director of Martin Warman Consultancy, providing services to support QbD- and PAT-enabled control strategies for both batch and continuous manufacturing. He has over 20 years’ experience working in the field, having previously led the PAT Development Team of Pfizer Global Manufacturing. He has also worked in academia, starting his career at the University of Westminster, UK, specialising in bioprocessing, and he has a bachelor’s degree in cell biochemistry. Martin is also on the executive committee of ASTM E55, covering pharma manufacturing, and chairs the E55.01 sub-committee, covering PAT. 
spacer
Alon Vaisman
spacer
spacer
spacer
Martin Warman
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement
News and Press Releases

Saudia Cargo launches state-of-the-art pharmaceutical cold storage facility at KAIA

MAY 2018 – Saudia Cargo has recently inaugurated one of the Region’s newest and most modern cold storage facilities of pharmaceuticals and medicines at King Abdulaziz International Airport (KAIA) to meet the surged demand on highly-sensitive and temperature-controlled shipments.
More info >>

White Papers

Life Cycle of an Analytical Method - a Case Study on the Monocyte Activation Test

Wickham Laboratories Limited

Pyrogens, a heterogeneous group of fever inducing contaminants, are comprised of microbial and non-microbial compounds; e.g. endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) produced by Gram-negative bacteria, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Gram-positive bacteria, bacterial DNA (CpG-motive), endogenous pyrogens, virus and fungi particles or even fragments of packaging materials, plastic and dust. Contaminat ion wi th pyrogens in pharmaceutical products, biotherapeutics and on medical devices can lead to life threatening fever reactions. To ensure consumer safety, pyrogen testing is mandatory for parenteral products and medical devices.
More info >>

 
Industry Events

Clinical Trial Supply Nordics 2018

19-20 June 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark

Building on last year’s success, our CTS team have conducted extensive research to ensure the 2018 event programme covers all the essentials in clinical supply. In the current climate, every pharma and biotech company are trying to reduce unwanted costs, and enhance operational efficiency. To avoid costly setbacks, an innovative and effective strategy needs to be implemented!
More info >>

 

 

©2000-2011 Samedan Ltd.
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement