samedan logo
 
 
spacer
home > epc > winter 2003 > streamlining phase i through a successful partnership strategy
PUBLICATIONS
European Pharmaceutical Contractor

Streamlining Phase I Through a Successful Partnership Strategy

The industry is under increasing pressure to streamline all phases of new drug development and significant emphasis is being placed on the ability of Phase I to identify and 'kill' unsatisfactory candidates quickly and efficiently. At the same time, this phase must arm the winners with not just safety information, but as much efficacy data as possible to help smooth the transition into later-phase clinical trials. These trends have strategic implications not only in the design of studies and programmes, but also in the organisation of R&D and selection of outsourced development partners.

Key Strategic Role of Phase I in Drug Development

Today, it takes around 15 years to develop a new drug from synthesis to NDA approval, and with the attrition rates associated with this process, the full R&D costs are, on average, more than US$800 million, with most of this being incurred during later phases of clinical development. Subsequent sales revenues are only sufficient to recoup the R&D investment for around a third of all drugs on the market. Therefore, the majority of launched products could have been terminated in R&D with a net financial benefit to the company. These considerations place significant economic emphasis on the selection and backing of only the winning candidate drugs. At the same time, new technologies in drug discovery, such as high-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry and the 'omics', are generating more and more potential therapeutic targets. The net result is that the industry needs to be increasingly discerning in its selection process, identifying the very best candidate drugs from an expanding reservoir of new chemical entities entering development.

The real challenge is to identify the 'losers' and to stop their development as soon as possible. Apart from time, the key metrics in this process are safety, efficacy and commercial viability. With regards to safety and efficacy, a great deal of information can be obtained from increasingly rigorous in silico, in vitro and animal models available to support discovery and preclinical development phases.


Read full article >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

spacer
By Dr David Griffiths, Head of Business Development at LCG Bioscience

Dr David Griffiths joined LCG Bioscience as Head of Business Development in 1998, where he has played a pivotal role in creating one of the foremost European CROs specialising in exploratory phase clinical development. David's career began in R&D positions with Shell and Pfizer during which time he obtained a BSc in Applied Biology and a PhD in Drug Metabolism. He then joined a biotech start-up company as a Development Scientist, moving into business development where he was responsible for several successful projects within a fast growing diagnostics and health care group. David also holds an MBA from Anglia Business School, Cambridge.

spacer
Dr David Griffiths
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement

Industry Events

Small Scale Biomanufacturing – clinical trials, cell & gene therapies

18 September 2008, Clifton Pavilion, Bristol Zoo Gardens, Bristol

This one day conference, sponsored by bioProcessUK and organised by BioApproaches South West, will cover key, important topics relating to small scale GMP biomanufacturing.
More info >>

 
News and Press Releases

MipTec, October 14 – 16, 2008, Switzerland

MipTec about to take off by joining forces between Life Sciences Week, ALL-SystemsX.ch-Day, & Jobvector.com    
More info >>

 

©2000-2007 Samedan Ltd.
About Us | Register | Login | Site Map | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us |
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement