samedan logo
 
 
spacer
home > epc > autumn 2002 > comparison of the regulatory ames test with the sos/umu assay as part of lead optimisation screening
PUBLICATIONS
European Pharmaceutical Contractor

Comparison of the Regulatory Ames Test with the SOS/umu Assay as Part of Lead Optimisation Screening

In our experience, regulatory genetic toxicology testing consistently produces 20-25 per cent in vitro positive results each year (Ames, cytogenetics and mammalian cell mutation). For the customers concerned, this means, at best, significant delays while further testing is carried out using more precious compound. At worst the pharmaceutical will fail further down the development pipeline.

Either way a positive genetic toxicology result leads to considerable cost and delay. The problem is even greater when using the 'fast-track, early into human' approach preferred by some customers when the toxicology study package has been 'compressed' to save time. A significant failure will bring down a whole programme. To aid screening for potential genotoxins, we assessed the performance of the SOS/umu assay, carried out in microwell plates, when compared to the regulatory Ames test performed to OECD guidelines.

Materials and Methods

The SOS/umu assay, performed in microwell plates, has the advantage of being sensitive to a wide range of genotoxins and has been shown to correlate well with the Ames test.


Read full article >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

spacer
By Jon Kitching, Department of Experimental Biology at Huntingdon Life Sciences

Jon Kitching heads up the Molecular Toxicology Group within the Experimental Biology Department at Huntingdon Life Sciences. With a dual honours degree in Biochemistry and Microbiology, Jon previously worked in genetic toxicology for 12 years.

spacer
Jon Kitching
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement

Industry Events

4th Annual Patient Recruitment and Retention in Clinical Trials

13-15 October 2008, Amsterdam

Patient recruitment is now consuming thirty percent of clinical trial time - more time than any other clinical trial activity - and almost half of all trial delays result from patient recruitment problems. As the recruiting culture becomes more sophisticated and the forces affecting patient enrollment grow more numerous and complex, pharmaceutical companies are striving to discover new strategies to facilitate enrollment in clinical trials. With increasing industry pressure to develop, test and market greater numbers of new drugs faster, pharmaceutical companies need to perform clinical trials as quickly as possible. Inefficient patient recruitment processes is a formidable barrier to pharmaceutical companies' success in launching new products. Improving the patient recruitment process is imperative to avoid wasted investments and eliminate costly delays in bringing new drugs to market -- today and even more so in the not-so-distant future. Improved patient recruitment presents one of the largest opportunities for pharmaceutical companies to eliminate delays in clinical trials, thereby making it possible to reduce time to market.  With patent time limits and large overheads meaning that any delays in the development timeline can be disastrous, a good understanding of how to successfully recruit patients for trials is vital for any company looking to succeed.
More info >>

 
News and Press Releases

“PACK DIFFERENT” with EMBALLAGE 2008

“Business, Innovation, Outlook” are the watchwords for the 38th World Packaging Exhibition which opens in Paris from 17 to 21 November 2008. Fifteen months before the key packaging event of the end of 2008, EMBALLAGE displays its differences to offer you a new edition that is even more representative, international and rich in new features.
More info >>

 

©2000-2007 Samedan Ltd.
About Us | Register | Login | Site Map | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us |
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement