home > epc > summer 2015 > letter from the editor
European Pharmaceutical Contractor

Letter from the Editor

All industry players know that speed is of the essence in pharma R&D. Karyn Korieth and Annick Anderson at CenterWatch report that, over the last 15 years, efforts to improve the pace and efficiency of drug development have had little success, and no significant gains have been made in reducing median clinical cycle times. The company’s recent analysis looked at over 300 approvals from 2000 to 2013, and found that the average duration between investigational new drug and new drug application status was around 5.6 years. However, these findings hide the high degree of variability when comparing the fastest and slowest developers, and also mask an inconsistency in cycle times across different therapeutic areas. As well as providing advice from standout sponsors, the authors warn that maintaining speed advantages for long periods is no mean feat.

In this edition of EPC, we have two features addressing two rather different localities. Jim Worrell at AmeriStart gives some useful guidance on how to break into the North American market, often seen as a prime opportunity for business expansion. He notes that breaking into the US can be expensive, risky and cause delays, and that a wise strategy may be to ignore the region’s prospects altogether. Nonetheless, Worrell suggests 12 steps that, with the right amount of patience, can bring European life sciences firms US success.

The Turkish market is also one that may present challenges, but can eventually yield significant benefits. Ömer Sadun Okyaltırık and Yamin Khan at Pharm-Olam outline some of the advantages of carrying out clinical trials in the country – namely, the high number of potential, treatment-naïve patients, a practical registry process and competitive cost structure. The authors conclude that the regulatory, regional and linguistic barriers are minor when weighed against the rewards on offer, and can easily be surmounted with the help of a local partner that is familiar with regional practices and restrictions.

Patient safety and the reporting thereof is a topic addressed by PSI CRO’s Maxim Kosov, John Riefler and Maxim Belotserkovskiy, who discuss the thorny issue of prompt recognition of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their causal relationships with study products. They highlight that ADRs can be difficult to differentiate from patients’ underlying disease symptoms, using two examples where the sponsors and investigators have disagreed in their interpretation. It is proposed that event causality may be crucial to the fate of a drug if this interpretation is incorrect.

Marc Hoffman of Theorem Clinical Research weighs in on the patient protection debate too – particularly in relation to vulnerable research subjects. Regrettably, history is full of reports on the abuse of patients’ rights, especially those in at-risk populations. But Hoffman asserts that, in recent times, protection has dramatically improved, while underlining that patient safety should be the number one priority of those working in clinical research.

The theme of protection also extends to the article by Jeannette Paulussen at WIL Research. She defines the objectives of the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, which aims to further safeguard the general public against the effects of substances. Paulussen describes how the latest enactment of REACH is impacting companies, and recommends that pharma enlist the assistance of an experienced toxicology CRO to provide peace of mind, as well as accurate and efficient substance production.

These are just a small selection of the wealth of interesting pieces featured in EPC June. I would like to finish by thanking all our contributors – you have made for a varied and informative issue.

Read full article from PDF >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:

There are no comments in regards to this article.


Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement
News and Press Releases

MedPharm’s CSO and University of Reading Professor co-author new book on dermal formulation development

MedPharm’s Chief Scientific Officer and Co-Founder, Professor Marc Brown and University of Reading’s Professor Adrian Williams have co-authored the new book: ‘The Art and Science of Dermal Formulation Development”. It is the latest addition to ‘Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences’, a series of textbooks and monographs published by CRC Press.
More info >>

White Papers

7 Common Myths about QP Training Debunked: A Guide for Senior Managers


The role of the Qualified Person (QP) in the pharmaceutical industry is mandated by law (Directive 2001/83/EC, Directive 2001/20/EC, UK SI 2012/1916, UK SI 2004/103). Every holder of a relevant Manufacturers Authorisation (human and veterinary) must have at least one QP; without one, no batch of medicinal product can be certified for release for sale.
More info >>

Industry Events

Nordic Life Science Days 10/12 September 2019

10-12 September 2019, Malmo Sweden

Nordic Life Science Days is the largest Nordic partnering conference for the global Life Science industry. Bringing together the best talents in Life Science, offering amazing networking and partnering opportunities, providing inputs and content on the most recent trends. Nordic Life Science Days attracts leading decision makers from the Life Science sector, not only from biotech, pharma and medtech but also from finances, research, policy and regulatory authorities.
More info >>



©2000-2011 Samedan Ltd.
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement