home > pmps > winter 2014 > liquid assets
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Packing Sourcer

Liquid Assets

In the nineteenth century, the London Hydraulic Company had 181 miles of hydraulic cable running underneath the UK capital, providing power to its factories. Yet this little-known fact is rarely referenced in the history books.

Indeed, the provision of energy to manufacturing, irrespective of its form, has always been hidden. In the process industry, the transfer of energy in the form of heat is so hidden that it is extremely common for a plant manager or chief engineer to have no idea of the correct methods of thermal fluid maintenance.

System maintenance work on thermal fluid may not be the first thing that comes to mind for the average plant manager. However, without periodic system drain, flush and full charge of new thermal fluid or planned preventative maintenance, systems have a habit of breaking down at the most inconvenient and expensive times (1).

Sampling Systems

Regular thermal fluid sampling serves as an early warning system for future events, and enables us to plan effectively how to increase the productivity of a system so that it runs efficiently at all times. Plant managers want to operate a safe business knowing that thermal fluid is managed in-line with the requirements of the UK’s Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002, and the European ATEX Directives (2).

Proper maintenance reduces the carbon deposition and fouling which damages systems. Average capital expenditure costs for replacement parts are up to £21,000 ($32,657, €25,000) for a heater coil and £45,000 ($70,000, €53,378) for a new heater – based on a system of just 50,000 litres. This does not include the cost of draining the system, flushing it and replacing the thermal fluid.

By proactively managing thermal fluid, focused maintenance also lowers the environmental impact of a plant by reducing waste and decreasing health and safety risks, while complying with insurance requirements.

Regular Maintenance

Degraded oil in a system wastes energy because pumps have to work harder. As a result, a maintenance plan will regularly assess the extent of system wear by incorporating routine thermal fluid sampling. Regular sampling may also highlight an increase in carbon, which will ultimately reduce the efficiency of the thermal fluid because carbon acts as an insulator. When carbon is present in thermal fluid, it demands more energy to maintain temperature – resulting in higher fuel costs.

A plant manager can ensure continual output and a safe and legal system by proactively taking thermal fluid samples and using the results to prompt a series of corrective actions, including periodic dilution, filtration and regular venting to ensure a safer system. This negates the need to flush the system and, as such, reduces waste and responsibility associated with waste management.

Top-up of thermal fluid is sufficient in some cases, but proper thermal fluid management is preferable. The minimum annual requirement for system safety surveillance – to check for things like leaking flanges – provides a baseline service from which a maintenance plan can be developed. This can be achieved by switching the frequency to a half-yearly cycle, or to a three-monthly cycle in an ideal situation.

Analysis and sampling to check for flashpoint, viscosity and carbon build-up should be more frequent: twice a year minimum, but every three months is better, and less than three-monthly is preferable.

Leaks and Cavities

In the case of top-ups, the analogy of a central heating system can be quite useful. Radiators are bled and water is topped up every year before the cold season to remedy any leaks and air cavities that may have formed through an air collector. If this is not done, the flow of a system can easily be compromised, making it perform less efficiently.

Similarly, leaks and air cavities in a thermal fluid system can typically account for a five per cent fluid loss, which needs to be topped up. However, top-up is a poor substitute for a complete fluid management system, which will ensure that the fluid is in a safe and healthy condition. Complete fluid care is a lifecycle management process, involving fluid sampling and analysis of the results, as well as getting fluid to the site and correct disposal of old fluid.

Synthetic or Mineral?

Synthetic heat transfer fluids are designed to resist thermal cracking and oxidation better than mineral fluids. As a result, a minimum maintenance plan may be appropriate for a synthetic fluid, whereas more frequent sampling may be needed for mineral fluids – which are subject to quicker thermal cracking.

Light ends are a common result of thermal cracking (3). Thermal oil with excessive light ends will build an explosive atmosphere in the expansion tank, drain tank, boiler room or factory, in the event of a leak. Light ends are the lower-boiling components of a mixture of hydrocarbons, such as those evaporated or distilled off easily in comparison to the bulk of the mixture. Examples include low molecular weight organic compounds such as methane, ethane and propane, which can be included as components in the oil.

Frequent Sampling

Another reason for frequent sampling and regular maintenance – which should include a safety survey and training – is to produce trend data from the results. In an ideal world, there would be continuous measurement of temperature fluctuations, carbon build-up and other important parameters which affect thermal fluid performance and present health and safety risks.

The annual fluid analysis should be complemented by adequate environmental allowances for workers, which may necessitate fitting flash guards or similar equipment. This is particularly true if there is activity in a zoned explosive risk area. Ideally, the entire site should be covered by an engineer who is trained to take thermal fluid samples, and staff who are fully briefed in how to read and interpret analysis results.


While heat transfer fluid might be a hidden form of transferring energy from one point to another – and perhaps not one most associated with the concept of sustainability – it is essential that we begin thinking about it in this way. It has to be sustainable from a maintenance perspective, sustainable from an energy management standpoint and sustainable economically.

The correct choice of fluid and the correct maintenance will go a long way towards achieving this. We may have forgotten the London Hydraulic Company and its 181 miles of cable, but we cannot afford to forget the maintenance of our own heat transfer fluids.

1. Visit:
2. Visit:
3. Visit:

Read full article from PDF >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:

There are no comments in regards to this article.

Clive Jones is the founder and Managing Director of the Global Group of Companies which he set up when he was just 17 years old. The Global Group of Companies has a range of business interests from the supply of hygiene and industrial consumables, storage and distribution, through to oil and thermal fluids. Clive is heavily involved in business development, nurturing overseas partnerships and distribution agreements in new territories, along with strategic planning and developing new ways of solving problems for heat transfer in manufacturing industries.
Clive Jones
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement
News and Press Releases

Merck Introduces Parteck® COAT Excipient, a Fast-Dissolving Material for Immediate Release Coating

• Designed to simplify the formulation and coating process for tablets • Optimized particle size leads to fast dissolving and increases coating process efficiency Merck has launched its Parteck® COAT excipient, a new functional material designed for immediate release film coating applications. Parteck® COAT is a particle engineered polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with a unique particle structure that enables rapid dissolution even at low temperatures leading to an increased process efficiency.
More info >>

White Papers

The Flexible Factory Concept: A flexible bioprocessing platform to meet the changing needs of biomanufacturing

GE Healthcare Life Sciences

For the past several years, the biopharma industry has been buffeted by dynamic market conditions that are rapidly reshaping manufacturing requirements. These factors include: • The rise of small-market pharmaceuticals that do not require the production scale of the previous “blockbuster” drug model • Increased titers and process productivity that generate more bulk-product within a much smaller manufacturing footprint • The emergence of biosimilars and continued evolution of healthcare reform, which will increasingly pressure drug pricing and require greater cost discipline • Greater competition and shorter patent protection timelines, which will further ratchet up time-to-market pressures • Tighter capital markets that will create heightened scrutiny for all new investment projects
More info >>

Industry Events


15-17 July 2020, Javits Center NYC

More info >>



©2000-2011 Samedan Ltd.
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement