samedan logo
 
 
spacer
home > pmps > spring 2003 > modified-release oral solid dosage forms - part ii: microstructure and release mechanisms
PUBLICATIONS
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Packing Sourcer

Modified-Release Oral Solid Dosage Forms - Part II: Microstructure and Release Mechanisms

This second part of the article reviews the effects of matrix and coating formulation and formation on the design of microstructure and release mechanisms of modified release oral solid dosage forms (tablets and particles). The microstructure of each system as defined by porosity, channel tortuosity, flexibility and durability, depends on the physical and chemical parameters of the polymers and drugs used. Mechanicals appear to be similar to those of ceramic/polymer composites but their effects on drug release are still under investigation. Drug release from the bulk of matrix and coating systems involves two major mechanisms. The erosion rate of the matrix determines the drug release rate in matrices governed by erosion or dissolution: (dM/dt)=S(dx/dt)f(C), where (dM/dt) is the drug release rate, S is the surface area, (dx/dt) is the matrix erosion rate and f(C) is the drug concentration gradient. The diffusion through a barrier membrane describes drug release in insoluble coatings via Fick's second law of diffusion: (dM/dt)=DSK(Cd-Cr)/h, where (dM/dt) is the drug release rate, D is the diffusion coefficient, S is the exposed surface area, K is the partition coefficient, Cd-Cr is the drug concentration gradient and h is the coating thickness.

Drug delivery at zero rate provides uniform drug adsorption and distribution into systemic circulation so that the drug level is maintained at the therapeutic window to minimise side effects and/or reduce the frequency of administration. Elucidation of the mechanisms of drug release from various matrix and coating systems is therefore critical in order for improvements to be realised. Many researchers have sought to design zero release mechanisms. Hydrophilic matrices have been reported to display a time release dependent profile due to an increase in the diffusion path length as the matrix dissolves, swells and releases drug.

This inherent limitation leads to first-order kinetics (1). One can therefore understand the significance of examining the release mechanisms of the various oral solid dosage forms. Form design has a tremendous impact on the drug release characteristics. The fine form design at the molecular level as defined by porosity, channel tortuosity, flexibility and durability is the so called 'microstructure'.


Read full article >>

Rate this article You must be a member of the site to make a vote.  
Average rating:
0
     

There are no comments in regards to this article.

spacer
By Dr Emmanuel Dimotakis and Dr Robert A Nash, Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology

Dr Emmanuel Dimotakis joined Sun Chemical as an Associate Scientist in 1998 and is currently a Scientist II. His expertise is in product development with emphasis on nanostructure-property relationships and formulation/rheology of polymers for coatings/colorants, nanomaterials and lithography. He has introduced products into the market, published 15 articles, 3 US/WO Patents (others are pending) and 12 government reports to NASA/DOD.

He was formerly with E. Merck and before that with MER Corporation. Dr Dimotakis received his PhD in Chemistry at Michigan State University in 1990 and undertook Postdoctoral work in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.


Dr Robert A Nash is Adjunct Professor of Pharmaceutical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, USA. Before that he taught at NJIT and St John's University.

Dr Nash spent 24 years in the US pharmaceutical industry with Merck, Lederle and the Purdue Frederick Co. in roles varying from Researcher to Manager of Pharmaceutical R&D. Dr Nash is Co-Editor of Pharmaceutical Process Validation published by Marcel Dekker & Co, New York. He is also a Consultant to the US FDA on validation and GMP matters.


spacer
Dr Emmanuel Dimotakis
spacer
spacer
spacer
Dr Robert A Nash
spacer
spacer
Print this page
Send to a friend
Privacy statement

Industry Events

4th Annual Patient Recruitment and Retention in Clinical Trials

13-15 October 2008, Amsterdam

Patient recruitment is now consuming thirty percent of clinical trial time - more time than any other clinical trial activity - and almost half of all trial delays result from patient recruitment problems. As the recruiting culture becomes more sophisticated and the forces affecting patient enrollment grow more numerous and complex, pharmaceutical companies are striving to discover new strategies to facilitate enrollment in clinical trials. With increasing industry pressure to develop, test and market greater numbers of new drugs faster, pharmaceutical companies need to perform clinical trials as quickly as possible. Inefficient patient recruitment processes is a formidable barrier to pharmaceutical companies' success in launching new products. Improving the patient recruitment process is imperative to avoid wasted investments and eliminate costly delays in bringing new drugs to market -- today and even more so in the not-so-distant future. Improved patient recruitment presents one of the largest opportunities for pharmaceutical companies to eliminate delays in clinical trials, thereby making it possible to reduce time to market.  With patent time limits and large overheads meaning that any delays in the development timeline can be disastrous, a good understanding of how to successfully recruit patients for trials is vital for any company looking to succeed.
More info >>

 
News and Press Releases

Ultra slim and ultra quick


More info >>

 

©2000-2007 Samedan Ltd.
About Us | Register | Login | Site Map | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us |
Add to favourites

Print this page

Send to a friend
Privacy statement